Gas Detection    |    CO2 Detection    |    Gas pressure proving    |    Gas Proving & Detection    |    Ventilation Interlock    |    Ancillary Controls
Commercial kitchen    |    Education Facilities    |    School laboratories    |    Boiler rooms    |    Commercial Buildings

Search

Individual laboratory control?

Individual laboratory control?

There are three main areas of gas control in education buildings:

  • Boiler room
  • Production Kitchen
  • Teaching Areas – including Laboratories, Food Technology etc.

Teaching areas unlike a boiler room or production kitchen allow access to gas outlets that is not limited to authorised or trained personnel but also students. Therefore control of gas is paramount for the safety of the building and its occupants.

When looking at designing or implementing gas safety control measures for a classroom consideration should be given to the user, equipment/appliances installed and potential for risk.

IGEM/UP11/Edition 2

  • This standard sets down the minimum requirement for safety in educational establishments for architects, designers, science health and safety advisers, teaching and technical staff.
  • It is recognised a Risk Assessment may indicate the need for additional safety measures.

An important part of UP11 is the statement that Laboratories should be designed as individual units with individual gas safety control per unit, this includes preparation rooms.

The Institute of Gas Engineers and Managers (IGEM) document UP11 edition 2 under Section 7: Laboratories 7.1 “Laboratories should be designed as individual units with individual gas safety controls for each unit.” For the purpose of the design standard the term “laboratories” includes “preparation rooms”. This is also supported in section 6.2.4.1. “The AIV should be fitted to each separate teaching area in which gas is being used.”

Additionally from our own onsite experience from a PFI schools project where a single system was installed to try and control a number of laboratories gas supplies several operational issues where identified. Subsequently the schools found it impractical to operate and the HSE became involved.

The main problems identified were:

  • Any identified gas leak meant all classrooms were unusable until the leak was found and repaired.
  • An accidental activation of an installed EM stop in one room caused all laboratories to lose gas.
  • An open gas tap could mean all gas within the installation downstream from the AIV would escape and build up in a single room.
  • The amount of gas pipe work installed meant an increased fill and prove time.
  • Gas cannot be isolated from a individual classrooms when not in use.
  • The operator on switching on the control panel was unable to see the gas taps, so would be unaware of any potential safety issue that would normally restrict or warrant gas remaining isolated.

Following these concerns the HSE stated that each room must have its own gas safety system because when the proving panel is switched on the operative must be able to see all the gas outlets and potential considerations of risk.
Also consider that the operative is responsible for allowing gas into a teaching area.
Operator control of the gas supply in a laboratory is the most effective way to ensure maximum gas safety and teaching time efficiency.
The most efficient way to achieve this is by means of a panel fitted behind the teacher’s desk that controls an automatic isolation valve (AIV). If the gas supply to the student benches is not required during a teaching period, the gas supply should be isolated from the room. A key switch and emergency stop button should be incorporated into such a panel.

The Institute of Gas Engineers and Managers (IGEM) document UP11 edition 2 states under 6.2.4.1 that “Where an AIV (gas solenoid valve) is required the system shall include a downstream integrity check before the valve can be reopened.”

Additionally to UP11 there is further guidance for service control within Building Bulletin 80 (revised 2004) Science Accommodation in Secondary Schools – A design Guide. Published by Schools Building and Design Unit (SBDU).

“Services. All services should have a master control panel, which should be located near the main teaching (demonstration position). This allows the teacher to control access to services as required and also to shut off any or all in the event of an accident”

If you require any additional information on our systems to help meet these design standards or wish to discuss the standards further please don't hesitate to contact us.
twitterlogo @MedemUkLtd

enquiries@medem.co.uk

IGEM/UP11/Edition 2, Gas installations for educational establishments

IGEM/UP11/Edition 2, Gas installations for educational establishments

The Institute of Gas Engineers and Managers (IGEM) document UP11 Edition 2, Gas installations for educational establishments.

more >>

Differential pressure proving?

Differential pressure proving?

Why choose Medem differential pressure proving?

The differential gas pressure proving method as developed and patented by Medem operates by *measuring* the pressure deferentially across the inlet and....

more >>

SEC-L

SEC-L

The SEC-L, a multi-function solution designed for the laboratory

Gas pressure proving
Gas detection
Electrical and Water isolation
Demand controlled ventilation

more >>

GPPS-evo

GPPS-evo

GPPS-evo, combines and supersedes the GPPS-L & L-CO2 panels

more >>

SEC-Elite

SEC-Elite

The SEC-Elite is a gas proving system capable of pressure proving up to 4 gas lines from a single panel with individual control.

more >>